In Ahmedabad, a student from the Apollo Institute of Engineering and Technology faced disappointment when the Gujarat High Court dismissed his writ petition against his exam results. The student claimed he had requested a reassessment of his marks after he failed. He argued that despite answering some questions, he received no marks for them. However, the court found that the evaluation was done by subject experts, and there was no bias against the student. The court stated that the student could not demand to keep the answer key either. The student had appeared for his exams, and his results were announced on March 13, 2025, indicating he had failed. Following this, he applied for reassessment. Despite his request, the results did not change. He contacted the university via email to request a re-evaluation of his answer sheet, which they agreed to upload soon. He obtained his mark sheet and showed it to a subject expert, who believed there was an error in the grading. Based on this opinion, the student sent two more emails requesting a reassessment. The student stated that the university merely re-calculated his previous marks, and despite answering several questions, he received no scores for them. The situation highlights the struggles students face with exam results and the importance of proper evaluation processes in educational institutions. In Gujarat, exam results are a significant concern for students. Many students feel the pressure to pass and achieve good grades for future admissions. The issue of students failing and the statistics surrounding pass rates is a topic of ongoing discussion in the educational landscape. The recent SSC (Secondary School Certificate) results showed varying pass percentages among boys and girls, raising questions about the educational environment and support systems available. Overall, the case emphasizes the need for transparency and fairness in educational assessments to ensure students receive the marks they deserve based on their performance.
Leave a Reply