In Ahmedabad, the Gujarat High Court has denied a request from food vendors near H L College and CEPT University for interim relief. The vendors had appealed against the removal of their stalls by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC). Justice Niral R Mehta, who presided over the case, stated that the court would not intervene at this stage. The AMC argued during the hearing that the stalls are located on a major road, causing significant traffic congestion. They highlighted that the area near Commerce Six Roads is one of the busiest junctions in the city. The AMC officials explained how the vendors’ stalls occupy footpaths, forcing pedestrians onto the road. This situation leads to dangerous roadside parking and worsens traffic flow. The AMC also noted that the vendors are violating the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, which prohibits cooking on public roads. They insisted that the vendors cannot be allowed to operate in such a critical traffic area. The AMC’s lawyer emphasized that while the corporation supports vendors’ right to earn a living, it cannot come at the cost of public safety and convenience. In response, the vendors claimed they have operated in this location for years and are part of the local community. They argued that the removal of their stalls without a proper relocation plan is unfair. One vendor, who wished to remain anonymous, shared, “We serve many students and office workers every day. Instead of helping us find a designated area, they are simply pushing us out. Where will we go?” The court has scheduled a follow-up hearing later this month and instructed the vendors to refrain from setting up their stalls until a final decision is made. This ruling might influence future cases in Ahmedabad and other cities where street vending and traffic management are contentious issues. The outcome could impact the livelihoods of many vendors who rely on their stalls for income. The ongoing debate raises questions about urban planning and the rights of street vendors in busy cities like Ahmedabad. As the city continues its anti-encroachment drive, the balance between public safety and the livelihood of vendors remains a critical concern. The situation highlights the need for a comprehensive plan that accommodates both the city’s traffic needs and the rights of small vendors to operate sustainably. As the next court date approaches, many will be watching closely to see how the legal system addresses this complex issue.
